Roissy’s post on Girls and Politics got me thinking. As someone whose political leanings fall outside of the DC mainstream, this is something I deal with on a regular basis. It also got me thinking about something else I’ve been noticing. On a recent trip to Whole Foods (which, by the way, is always good for observing multiple incidences of SWPL) I observed a new phenomenon. I saw multiple couples where at first I thought there was huge mismatch in favor of the girl (i.e. the guy was better looking). In all instances I soon realized that there was something evening up the score: the guys were total morons. Granted, that’s a tough diagnosis to make from a few moments observation in a supermarket; but when one guy is wearing a crooked baseball cap and making awkward, gang-ish hand signs and another is goofily grinning at some checkout-aisle tabloid, they just might not be the sharpest tools in the shed. Not to mention, the women in both cases did not seem to be the slightest bit amused. They honestly looked like mothers dealing with annoying children.
I’ve heard a lot from women recently about using certain political or ideological litmus tests for men they hook up with or date. This seems a strange idea to me. Personally, I hate echo chambers; nothing irks me more than being surrounded by people who think exactly what I think. I like debate. I like to hear other people’s viewpoints. I like my own opinions to be challenged, because I realize that’s the only way to know whether I’m full of shit or not.
Where does idea of not dating guys who don’t share your politics come from? More importantly it seems a recipe for guys developing attachment to ideas they don’t really care about because it’s getting them laid. I tend to think that, in a democracy, the route that people take to come to their opinions is as important as those opinions themselves. Am I alone in this?
Being a Democrat or a Republican says very little about how open minded or intelligent you are. In fact, if you think it does, there’s a good chance that you are neither.
3 comments:
I wouldn't want a guy who agrees with everything I say, because then I would just date myself and save a ton of time on makeup and leg-shaving.
I think it's hard to find a midpoint: too many guys, especially in DC, turn EVERY conversation into a debate. They don't know when to quit, change the subject, and back off.
I'm looking for a nice dinner and a lively discussion - not a head-splitting cross-examination.
shannon:
i don't believe you. if you dated yourself, you would quickly become used to the feel of smooth legs and... well, that's not important, but you'd soon start turning an overly-critical eye on yourself; start shaving even more; and end up resenting yourself over having such high standards... for yourself.
The thing is, leftism is a crutch for people who want to be smart, but actually aren't. It offers a shortcut, as long as you only surround yourself with other leftists.
This superb article from Ace of Spades explains this.
Post a Comment